Start Here

Before we go any further, you might be asking:

Unseen Cost #1: Left to Figure It Out Alone

You, actor, have assistants who manage your calendar, stylists who make sure you look like the version of yourself the world expects to see. You have agents who negotiate your worth, dialect coaches who sculpt your voice, trainers to shape your body, and intimacy coordinators who help you navigate the most vulnerable scenes with safety and dignity.

Yet, when it comes to one of the most critical components—preparing for historical roles or biopics—you’re shockingly left to your own device. 

Instead of receiving the same level of professional support, you end up scrambling through Google searches or relying on Wikipedia, often sifting through incomplete or inaccurate information. 

This lack of reliable guidance can potentially lead to a cascade of problems: In the worst case? Misrepresentation of historical figures, distortion of key events, and the loss of authenticity that defines a great performance. The result? Bad reviews. A failed film. And ultimately, damage to your career. 

---

So, despite everything, you’re determined to delve deep into researching this historical role. Here’s what you’re told:

• »The script is the Bible. Everything you need is in the script.« 
• »There’s a memoir. It’ll give you insight.«
• »It’s a real person! Just start with Wikipedia.«

You try.
You highlight. You underline. 

But somewhere around hour 4 of reading a meticulously footnoted book, you realise something’s off. You’re learning about events. 

But not about fear. Or shame. Or helplessness. Or quiet joy. Or stubborn hope.

You end up with too much material that has already been filtered through the lens of a biographer.  

You stare at the pile of books and the folder of PDFs—each one arguing with the next—and realise you have to sift through all of it yourself. 

So you flip through timelines, hoping something sticks. Born in Hamburg, 1923. Married in 1944. Lost everything in 1945. But still—nothing feels real. 

Because you don’t know what their kitchen smelled like. 

You don’t know what they hoped for if they survived the winter. 

---

Unseen Cost #2: »You Should Consult A Scholar. And Meet Eyewitnesses.« 

So you talk to an expert. 

Maybe you found them yourself. Maybe production made an appointment for you. 

Maybe they’re brilliant. 

Maybe they’ve published 14 books on this exact era. 

And still—ninety minutes in—you’re left with fragments. Disconnected moments. Lists of random names and places. Nothing cohesive. 

After almost 3 hours, your conversation with the expert ends. 

As you leave, the professor wonders, »Why did they come so unprepared?«
You wonder, »Why couldn’t they see I’m new to this?«

Yes, you walk away with information. 

But no resonance. 

Three days later, a well-meant email arrives—with more PDFs. 

Maybe even a voice memo from the professor trying to cram four decades of knowledge into ten minutes.

You’re expected to transform this mess into something real, visceral, moving. Instead, you get context without contour. Names without nuance. Accuracy without access.

And if you ask questions? The answers are full of caveats: »We can’t be sure.«

»Not enough sources exist,« and 

»It depends on the region.«

OF COURSE IT DEPENDS. (History always does.) 

But those answers won’t help you play the scene. Slowly, you begin to understand…Professors and academics aren’t taught to write for tension. They write analyses. They write to explain, not to embody. 

• What a professor publishes isn’t made for actors. It’s made for students. For scholars. To impress other academics. It isn’t made to live in your body.
• Academics analyse history with the ending in mind—but your Air Force pilot had no clue that World War II would end in under three weeks.
• They follow the big arcs of history—not the small, human details that once carried unbearable weight for someone living through them. 

But it’s not just the outcome-focused way academics approach the past that makes it difficult—it’s something else too. 

• After researching a topic inside and out, often for decades, it becomes almost impossible for them to filter out what matters most. To condense years of knowledge into an hour isn’t just difficult—it feels almost unfair. 
• And because they don’t speak the language of storytelling, professors often don’t realise what would actually be useful to you—the actor trying to embody a person from the past. 
• Often, the language they use is dense, abstract, difficult to follow. This isn’t a criticism; I’ve spent years inside academia myself. It’s simply a bubble where people speak, write and publish in their own language. 

Yet again, you’re buried in too much material—or in the wrong kind entirely. None of it suited for what you truly need.

Because your job isn’t to reconstruct historical facts. It’s to recover the heartbeat.  

---

Then someone from production connects you with eyewitnesses. 

You spend an entire afternoon with a few men over a 100 years old, and their octogenarian children, in a retirement home. Some of them can barely remember the names of their RAF pilot colleagues. One asks his much younger wife, »What date was I shot at again?« Another simply recites the »official« version—highly redacted, carefully whitewashed—and when you press with more questions, you’re left with nothing.

You start to sense—you ask yourself—whether you should have looked into original sources that were closer to 1944, not an old man’s blurred memory.

As you drive home, one thought keeps nagging at you: historical research is like a puzzle. You should have started with the edges—the clearest, most stable parts.
Piece by piece, the rest could have taken shape. But instead, production handed you just one fragment: the eyewitness meeting. And that was supposed to be the whole picture?

---

Then there are the family members of the protagonist.

Again, entire afternoons having tea with strangers.

If you’re truly honest, it gave you a glimpse—but filtered through a bitter daughter’s lens, or softened through a loyal nephew’s version. Later, in interviews, you can say: yes, you met the eyewitnesses, you honoured the families. It sounds important. But what you don’t say is: You spoke to the people who knew those who had lived it (but they weren’t them!). How little those secondhand stories actually gave you—and how much it cost you to find that out too late. 

Again, you feel you should have gone straight to other sources: closer, more honest, less filtered. 

It looked like support. It felt like prep. But it wasn’t what you needed.

So you end up doing emotional labour in a vacuum—trying to imagine fear. Trying to guess grief. You rely on archetypes. Gestures. Echoes of other roles.

And it shows. Not because you didn’t care—but because what you were given wasn’t made for what you were asked to do.

---

Unseen Cost #3: You Don’t Need the Whole Era—Just One Detail That Lands

Here’s one of the biggest lies you’ve been told:

That to truly understand the person you’re portraying, you have to understand their entire era.

So you start ordering tons of books. Watch endless documentaries. Read and reread timelines. You highlight your scripts and mark the margins with year after year after year. You feel the pressure mount. 

And still—you don’t feel closer to them.

Because history doesn’t work like that.

You don’t need the whole decade. 

You need the hour they stopped believing their father would come home. 

You don’t need the entire war. 

You need the moment they realised they weren’t going to make it to Christmas.

You don’t need their full biography. 

You need the feeling of being 17 and holding your breath in a stairwell, praying the knock on the door isn’t for you. 

The industry pushes you toward scale—»cover it all,« »understand the macro,« »honour the period.« But your job is micro. Your job is moment. 

Your job is to take us so deeply into one hour, one moment, one feeling—that we believe the whole world exists around it. 

If this sparked something—I break down how emotional entry points can help rebuild a life from the past, and introduce a different way to start your film prep—right here on the info page for my 1:1 intensive designed for actors on a tight timeline, called »Get To Know Your Protagonist«. 

The truth is, the scene that stays with the audience isn’t the one with the perfect historical backdrop. It’s the one where you put your hand on a radio and wait. Where your mouth moves, but you’re too scared to speak. Where you hear a sound and your whole body tightens—not because the script says »fear,« but because you felt it.

One breath. one scene, one memory. 

When prep is personal, even one detail can hold an entire era.

That depth cannot be invented. 

It must be excavated. 

---

Let’s sum it up, shall we?

---

What if it could be different?

Your work needs more than accuracy. It needs emotion. It needs entry points. 

It needs someone to say: 

Here. This is the last letter she wrote on European soil—just before she boarded the ship to New York City. 

Here. This is the detailed packing list the German authorities sent them before being deported to a German concentration camp.

Here. This is the address he memorised, just in case he made it out.

These aren’t props. They’re portals.
They don’t belong in museums. They belong in your prep.

Because the minute you see them, read them, feel them—you stop performing. You start remembering.

And the audience can tell.

— They will feel that a ration card was never just a ration card. 

It’s a moment where a man realises he will have to choose which child eats first. 

— A scribbled floor plan isn’t just a map. 

It’s a record of how to escape the concentration camp. 

— A cancelled wedding announcement isn’t just heartbreak. 

It’s fate folding in on someone’s entire future.

This is the difference between being prepared and being present. This is the difference between a scene that’s okay—and a scene that stays.

Because the right detail doesn’t inform you. It finds you.

It breaks your heart a little. And that’s the beginning of everything.

---

I’m not here to flatten the past… I’m here to help you feel its sharp edges. 

And I think actors deserve something better than timelines and textbook facts to prepare for the most emotionally demanding roles of their careers. 

They deserve access to history that breathes.
To emotional entry points, not just historical summaries.
To the kinds of materials that don’t just inform you—but change you.

Guten Tag👋I’m Dr. Barbara from Germany.  

I’ve spent 15+ years working inside this world—as a researcher-for-hire. I studied history and archaeology, and I even wrote my dissertation on how to tell history in a gripping way. 

So far, I’ve worked on over 130 film, TV, and literary projects as a historical consultant—helping creators avoid clichés, dig deeper, and truly feel the weight of the past. And I’ve published more than 20 books along the way. 

But here’s what I realised: No matter how much you study, no matter how famous the person you’re portraying—you can’t improvise connection with the past. 

That’s why I specifically work with actors who want to go deeper, but don’t have time to do the digging alone. 

Let me find and hand you what helps you work—quietly, precisely, and with German thoroughness. So when you step into the scene, you’re not second-guessing, hesitating, or improvising: you already have what you need.  

---

You already have a character in mind. You know who he or she is—but not how they felt. 

Now you want to move past research overwhelm and into something that feels real.

Here’s what makes my work different: 

I don’t just research for accuracy. I research for rupture. The kind that slips under the skin and stays there. 

Just kidding—accuracy is a given. (I’m German, after all.) 

Yes, I’ve been trained to decipher almost any handwritten script from 50 AD to 1950.

I have a photographic memory, and I rarely forget a name. 

I’ve walked through concentration camps with eyewitnesses. 

I found a prisoner-of-war no one else could trace. (It took me 27 minutes.)

I’ve followed forgotten trails through five languages, 11 archives, and one last box in the attic no one thought to search.

What sets this work apart isn’t just the depth—it’s that I can find what’s real, explain why it matters, and give you exactly what your character needs to feel human. That’s when we work together—1:1.

»Get To Know Your Protagonist« is a deeply focused intensive that delivers a custom 5–10 page file about your character. This can be delivered in under 2 weeks. The materials help you start building your character’s backstory. It’s built to answer the questions most sources skip: 

• What was their greatest fear—and how did it shape everything?
• What did one ordinary day look like for them?
• What did their home smell like?
• What did they wear—did they allow themselves small, almost invisible deviations from what was expected?
• What did they never say out loud, because of the rules they lived with?
• What quiet forces—class, gender, religion, silence—shaped how they moved?

Emotional depth doesn’t come from guessing. It comes from historical evidence. Curated. Condensed. Made usable—for you. 

If you’re tired of collecting facts that go nowhere, and want emotional cues you can actually use, this is where we begin a research collaboration. (We can always delve in deeper, and find out more later.) Let me give you what helps you work—quietly, precisely, and with depth.

So if you’re someone who wants more than gestures, more than guesswork—then this might be where your preparation for the next role really begins.  

Let’s make the past real—on your schedule, for your role, in your rhythm. 

All images: CC0, photographer Nicola Perscheid // Judy Garland and collegaues // Kathleen Ardelle 1921 // Syrie Wellcome via Wellcome Library London // Ziegfeld Girl in black.